This is why anchorages are important. Unfortunately, not even waiting for 100% exhastion would give enough acceptance to a full victory (their surrender). It's far more devastating than catapults and cannons, but they're always there. War fatigue is specifically designed to make it hard for you to destroy big empires in 1 war, so it is doing its job. irritatedBowel. 631. War exhaustion for the small empire vs the AI Federation is at 89%. I didn't lose a single ship. when you can occupy everything but still lose. was still negative for SQ and even more so for wargoals. edit: Actually, missphrased that: To ENFORCE a surrender, you need to have 100% occupation. We're making changes to the War Exhaustion following your feedback. The only way to force surrender is to do what you have claimed to have done: Occupy everything the opposing side owns (including allies if they have any). The reason you need to occupy all the planets in systems you claimed to Enforce War Goals is that the game enforces a penalty for unoccupied systems and planets, which looks something like: planet (-10), system (-100). A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy…Gestalt Consciousness gives you a cool -20% to War Exhaustion. No, you're wrong. Agreed the war exhaustion system is fucked up, I have lost systems to the enemy while beating him to hands down he got no fleets left but I can't manage to tag back a system that he he took with a stray troop and suddenly the war is over and he wins the system and I cant do anything and I get none of his systems because I hadn't claimed. This of course means that they have some rebellion within. 1. This is then used to determine when one side will surrender and how much the winner can demand of them. And the fact war exhaustion ticks up means that it's actually possible to put enough armies on a planet to make a literally unconquerable planet. 100% war exhaustion means you used up what your country considers to be an okay amount of resources for war. Yeah, they really need to make spotting unconquered claims easier, especially in wars where your ally made the claims. i joined a war as a third party and attacked them. 100% War Exhaustion allows you to force an enemy to accept a Status Quo. You have the perfect start. Question. The year this. g. What he did was a very good tactical decision. . War exhaustion has nothing to do with how well a war is going. 5 war exhaustion. Claims change hands as normal in EVERY type of war. I'm pretty sure thats a bug and not intended. g. 24. 1 aspect I'm missing or seems counter intuitive to me is the war exhaustion mechanic. Business, Economics, and Finance. Even in victory casualties, resource drain, and general stress accumulate into exhaustion. Base War exhaustion is 3x faster. They didn't want to surrender so I killed half their population and yet still nothing. There needs to be a fix to war exhaustion so if you’re trouncing them by 25% or more when they’re at 100% exhaustion for like 3-6 months it’s a forced surrender. Story/rant time: I declare war on an awakened empire and absolutely stomp their entire fleet, their war exhaustion shoots up to 70 while mine is only at 20. CryptoHey! So, wars in stellaris work pretty differently from most games (only similar to other paradox games). He has no shipyards left - only 5 star bases, which he all built during the war. 100% war exhaustion is -100% stability Then multiply together effects from multiple wars. 24. However I saw no way to change my war goals. This means that territories etc will all be reversed back to their pre-war status. But then you see the dreaded pop up. If you are at a 100% warscore, AI will always accept all your demands. The way stellaris war exhaustion works is "Our arbitrary meter was crossed , now you need to sue for unconditional surrender. The current stellaris war exhaustion mechanic is a terribly awful mechanic and is probably one of the least fun aspects of the game. Business, Economics, and Finance. That's the war exhaustion system working correctly. It depends on time and on losses you suffer, even in victory. I have the +100 War Exhaustion and +50 Relative Navy Strength. You could have won years ago (100% war exhaustion starts a countdown, the enemy can’t force leave immediately) but you didn’t and this mechanic represents your citizenry becoming sick of it. You can never 'force' a surrender. I destroy the star fortress and flip it to my side, then I start bombing the two planets. No option for white peace or conditional surrender, it’s either fold to their demands and give the land or an entire country gets annexed. War exhaustion makes no sense. Though the fact the Overlord hasn't demanded surrender yet probably is a bug since the AI should be coded to demand surrender once the other side will accept it. The still wouldn't accept subjugation despite my war goal getting to zero. It should be a scaling modifier like in EU4. Once you have had 100% for 24 months you can force surrender. Maraudeur. in any case i definitely need to learn how to play the war exhaustion gameThe most important lesson is that war exhaustion isn't as important as it may seem. 392K subscribers in the Stellaris community. The AI gets massive war exhaustion reduction cheats which is why when you’re fighting a xenophobic slaving empire that wants to use your colonial population as a workforce even if no fighting ever happens, you’ll reach 100% before them and probably by quite a margin at higher difficulties. 181. Novaseerblyat • Machine Intelligence • 6 mo. I'm at war with another empire. Upon declaring victory or surrender, the victor receives a bonus to energy credits, influence, and a happiness modifier to their empire. Forum listWar Exhaustion doesn't mean you have to surrender. Can't invade the ally to try and force a surrender either since there's a 4th nation blocking you. Below is my. Ground combat takes place between the world owner's armies and the invader's armies. due ti my war exhaustion being at 100 and the enemy at 14. I have NO DLC and this is my fourth or fifth game War score is how badly you beat them, war exhaustion is their will to keep fighting. Jun 27, 2016 975 956. Once a war side reaches 100% war exhaustion, there is now a 24 month timer that starts ticking down. There is actually something to be said for paying attention to the game giving you a red warning flag. 2) Don't even fight - just try to surrender immediately, even though it will likely involve keeping the criminal problem. You actually reached 100% war exhaustion and didn't notice it. War Exhaustion is increased by destroying their fleets, as well as steadily over time. Before year 2394 (earliest save I can load back), we reached 74% / 100% in War Exhaustion, and I thought I had just to wait for a couple of years before status quo would be chosen by my war leader. More efficiently used pops = more alloys = more ships = fewer losses and an easier victory in any future war. Adding to this, a "status quo" peace isn't as bad as it sounds. Menu. Everything is glorious. pops feel drained by the mental strain of their telepathic cry for help (flavor text) Possible negative effects after war along with % chance of happening: 20% decreased biological pop resource output-- 30% chance. Not really. r/Stellaris • War exhaustion should be replaced with war taxes, happiness penalties and inner politics. I understand how it works, generally, that losing territory and battles increases your war exhaustion. The implementation makes no sense. In the case of a subjugation war, if you get a status quo then all the systems you fully occupy (meaning own the star base AND have successfully invaded with armies if there's a planet) wil splinter off into another new empire as your vassal. War Exhaustion and War Score are two very different things. Peace out via status quo and prepare for the next attack in 10 years. It doesn't measure anything. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. The act of surrendering is to abdicate to your demands in their entirety, you didn't want much, so you didn't get much. • 2 yr. This is then used to determine when one side will surrender and how much the winner can demand of them. My gripes with the combat system: Even when extremely outnumbered, disengage can yield 0 losses (aka 0. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. In Stellaris you loose no ships, take no damage, business is booming, you're maxed out on all resources, you have no enemy ships to fight, you still get war exhaustion. corsairmarks. A war of aggression was declared against me by an empire south of me (Nharr Empire). At this point you get whatever the war is being waged for. Militarists have no effect on war exhaustion. War Exhaustion is just a clock. Thread starter Dragonkat42; Start date Mar 3, 2018;. Is anyone else finding it difficult to raise the war exhaustion of the enemy? I went to war with an empire that had less ships and far less tech. But every war is different. The original empire has no reason to surrender as they are hoping the other empire will save them. But ok fine. Occupation breeds resistance. The ai only did status quo when it was at 100% war exhaustion for a little while. Your ally, not you, was the war leader and he forced. "Blowing up all their planets is good fun, but if you really want them to suffer, you should conquer them the conventional way and mark their species for slavery or extermination. #2. Status Quo can be enforced by either side as soon as 24 months have passed since the opposing side reached 100% war exhaustion, and if both sides reach 100% war exhaustion, the Status Quo is enforced automatically after 24. The. If you occuppy 90% of the required claims and won 90% of the battles that should be considered a win in my book, and if you lose 1 battle it shouldn't lead to an immediate forced white peace. On top of this, status quo peace treaty and war exhaustion exist. Personally I'm frustrated by the fact that I can cap an AI's war exhaustion and can't force their surrender. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. If you wish to be closer to RL then after having a high war exhaustion you should have penalties equalling a percentage of your total income. 0 Now 0. However even several years after reaching 100% exhaustion. I've also occupied around 6 planets as part of my goals, Killing 86 of their armies without. . So I'm in a war with this one empire, and they won't surrender. War Exhaustion has no effect at all outside being a counter until your opponent can force Status Quo peace, so disabling than option effectively removes the entire system. You've missed one planet (-100) and two systems (-40. . 75% of systems plus 75% war exhaustion would work). They reached 100% war exhaustion after a few years, but they didn't surrender. -----3) Disengage and Emergency Retreat While these are technically combat mechanics, they certainly play a role considering how crucial 1) is. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. " I was not given the option to have a war goal, strangely, because they are a fallen empire that declared war on me so I guess the only option was. WTF is war on a timer?. Y'can call it exhaustion if you want, against skynet its not exhaustion, it's just a timer. 414K subscribers in the Stellaris community. Thats another problem Stellaris has had from day one, no seperate peace. If you load the attached save game, you'll see the Adeex State (rebels) have been on 100% WE for years now, but won't surrender and oddly, hasn't been defeated. Occupation breeds resistance. Yes, but only for the final stage, or if the Galactic Community declares a preemptive crisis war. Since AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. Every planet was more or less occupied. The AI…This war has been going on for almost 15 years. So what ends up happening, is that once you take the war exhaustion to it's limit (+100), it cancels out the system penalty. Every other paradox game has War Score which is basically a track of who is winning and by how much. If you're invading a heavily fortified enemy you'll take much higher war exhaustion than them, but since you'll be taking systems it doesn't matter if you hit 80% war exhaustion when they're only at 20%—you stand to gain from the war and they stand to lose. No Please explain your issue is in as much detail as possible. empire A & C are fighting, but empire B is in the way, and has closed borders to both sides, making combat impossible) Stellaris doesn't need war exhaustion to be 100 to enforce the demand for surrenderunlike other Paradox's games. CryptoFirst of all get the crisis empire id (go to console -> type debugtooltip -> hover mouse over crisis empire -> get the id) Then type surrender <crisis empire id> (for eg: if the empire id is 5, type surrender 5) You will get war id's for all the war that empire is fighting. Stellaris AAR: No Love, No Comfort. Forced status quo is something one side can trigger when their opponent has been at 100% war exhaustion for at least 2 years, but they don't have to do that if they don't want to. Stellaris. No they aren't. -----3) Disengage and Emergency Retreat While these are technically combat mechanics, they certainly play a role considering how crucial 1) is. . Don't think of war exhaustion as an estimator of winning/losing, war exhaustion if it was to be broken down to its fundamental functionality, it is a timer, when this timer reaches its end the war can now be forced to end for the side that reached it. [PSA] 100% war exhaustion and Forced Status quo are not indicators of winning/losing a war. only the empire that declared war and the one that was declared upon can sue for peace, Allies/federation members cannot. Groud Battles: 0% (killing defensive armies doesn't matter I guess) Occupation: 24%. If you occuppy 90% of the required claims and won 90% of the battles that should be considered a win in my book, and if you lose 1 battle it shouldn't lead to an immediate forced white peace. Step 6: crash your economy because you choose a conquer war goal insteed vassalizing and enjoy micro manging all. The war exhaustion in this. To be fair, bubbles is indeed precious, and I deserve death for letting them die. 109 votes, 33 comments. 1% reduction. The war is not over at 100% war exhaustion; it carries out for two years more before anyone can force peace. But it’s not likely. Adds [deposit id] resource deposit or planetary feature to the selected celestial body. You can never 'force' a surrender. Remember to fully occupy every claimed system and planet before you do so. 113. 75% of systems plus 75% war exhaustion would work). It is now about war exhaustion. Always occupy then status quo by driving enemy war exhaustion to 100. . When the enemy's war exhaustion hits 100% (attrition slowly ticks up), you can force a status quo after two years regardless of whatever other acceptance penalties they have. I set it to fastest and am just waiting for them it to tick to 100% but GOD it's ticking slow. . Remember, that if your war exhaustion reaches 100% the AI can force Status. . For some reason Stellaris does not have this system and the closest thing that can fill the void is war exhaustion. i am CHEATING in my game and i just spent the last hour systematically going from enemy star to enemy star CRUSHING their starbases. Shad May 18, 2018 @ 5:08pm. so now even thought own all planets they will not give up. Don't think of war exhaustion as an estimator of winning/losing, war exhaustion if. Apparently my nation is 78% towards accepting a forced status quo, while the enemy only 56%. War Exhaustion is terrible. I am waging a war for claims as my. immortalfirelover • 5 yr. Once your war exhaustion reaches 100%, you have a two-year grace period, after which if your opponent wants peace, they can force you to accept it. Yes, but only for the final stage, or if the Galactic Community declares a preemptive crisis war. If you look at every historical scenario ever, losing Battle after Battle, failing to attack as the aggressor, and losing copius amounts of manpower and ships causes the aggressor to want to sue for peace, whereas when a defender actually, oh I don't know, defends their. Ships 'destroyed' this way cause 5x war exhaustion. If you reach 100% the AI will enforce a status quo, not their wargoal, so it should be equal, since you can do the same. (because war). Thats surprising given the design goal was specifically made to account for this. It only starts to matter if you're the attacker, both sides get to 100% and you haven't achieved all your goals yet. With no ability to force Status Quo, the war will continue until one side achieves their War Goals, or is entirely eradicated. This of course assuming my humans…For most wargoals war exhaustion isn't enough to get the AI to surrender, it's more useful for getting status quo with them. They were at 100% war Exhaustion I was at like 30% So lets end this war. They make it appear as "whoever has the most war exhaustion is losing" when that isn't really the case. When you get involved in a catastrophic war in stellaris, your planets and people never go up in arms or on strike. 1 more reply. About the first three years, the enemy's war weariness has reached 100%, and I think he will surrender automatically after two or three years, as written in the wiki. Business, Economics, and Finance. . This is honestly the most annoying part for me. As most of us know, war exhaustion in Stellaris is little more than a timer that eventually force empires to sign a white…Here's the exhaustion details: Attrition: 14%. 5 (Ships are more harder to replace than troops but still they are replaceable) WAR_EXHAUSTION_ARMY_KILLED_MULT = 0. If you are at a 100% warscore, AI will always accept all your demands. But no, they just give 0. Originally posted by Agent Orange: When an empire or alliance in a war reaches 100% war exhaustion, it can be forced into a status quo peace if you want to. This mod is in no way balanced so please use with that in mind. Pact with managed to anger a Fallen Empire and dragged myself and my vassals into war as a result. total_war = <yes/no> – Determines is this war goal a total war. I have NO DLC and this is my fourth or fifth gameWar score is how badly you beat them, war exhaustion is their will to keep fighting. The best part of war exhaustion is that "apparently" the game counts the ameba bubbles as a very valuable ship because when I lost it on a war on its juvenile from my war exhaustion jumped 8 points by itself. CryptoSince AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. Even worse, I occupy many of his planets,. If you want an enemy to surrender, you need to get your War Score up to a certain number (which is determined by the kind of war you're waging, the. #2. So here's what might have actually happened: 1. #1. But still. Waging wars in Stellaris ever since the CB system was added was not exactly fun. It indeed also limits your diplomatic options and interacts with that new pop growth trait. After that, I jump to their capital planets to cut off their production. Cato, they are not the same in Stellaris either. War exhaustion has two effects: 1. - Never surrender (-25%) Also the first tech is just a tier 2, you can get it very early:. ago. " They will be forced to auto-accept. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. :) Remember we're always looking for more suggestions and constructive criticism:. Why am I not. Business, Economics, and Finance. OgamiGoro Apr 13, 2020 @ 1:37pm. [PSA] 100% war exhaustion and Forced Status quo are not indicators of winning/losing a war. The system is a little strange, but there is a logic behind it. Don't think of war exhaustion as an estimator of winning/losing, war exhaustion if it was to be broken down to its fundamental functionality, it is a timer, when this timer reaches its end the war can now be forced to end for the side that reached it. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. But if you are at 5% attrition or 80% does not make a difference. I'm stuck in a war, I'm not one of the leaders, and I need it to end. I have completely occupied the main targets space and I mean there is literally not a single system or star that they have control over, their fleet is removed and my main fleets are on their way to blitzkrieg their ally aswell. The exhaustion in Stellaris, as mention above, is absolutely not tied to the necessary war. I creamed them in every fight barely losing any ships but they still only have 4% higher "Space Battle" Exhaustion than me. War exhaustion is just a bad status quo mechanic. When you reach 100 war exhaustion, you can't be forced to surrender unconditionally. CryptoA war where nothing happens should build up We, but being stuck at 100 for years with no way out but surrender seems like a bad outcome. So I have a war going on against a faction and their ally. CryptoIf you slap penalties on 100% war exhaustion, the smaller, losing side will accrue those penalties for the majority of the war's duration since they normally reach 100% WE very quickly due to, well, losing the war. trueBasically you get exhaustion from ship losses in proportion to the number of fleet points worth of ships lost in comparison to your fleet cap. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. Yes, they have enough fleets somewhere. 11. It is written that if your war exhaustion reaches 100% you may be forced to peace after 2 years. ago. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. I destroy the star fortress and flip it to my side, then I start bombing the two planets. Everything is glorious. The war exhaustion in this game does not work well. Same thing can happen with 2 players. If you have 100 fleet cap you get. A couple of things. Rebels of an ally won't surrender despite now reaching 100% War Exhaustion in their rebellion war. War exhaustion in the absolute best case just. Whenever i attack someone, my war exhaustion builds up much faster than them, even if im getting all my claimed systems and that being my wargoal. I don't want to go to war with the AI Federation. If all your planets are claimed you could be in trouble lol. War exhaustion should be an empire modifier rather than a war score knockoff. This is the problem with the war exhaustion system: it makes no sense. Guaranteed Independence leads to Neverending War!! I have a rival empire just below me that's been a pain in my ass since the beginning. It made absolutely no sense. step 4 : when you take a system with a planet in it land your army units on the planet to take it. Any time a ship is lost. Usually I find they won't accept due to demanding unoccupied systems/planets. #3. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. That's your clearest indicator that you haven't occupied everything yet. It will make them accept any status quo peace you offer (in wich you would get the terriotries you have claims on AND occupy militarily, so often a white peace is a way better option to end a war then going. Reaching the war exhaustion threshold of 20 (100) in a war will incur some minor. No acceptance is the same (function wise) in both games. Our federation had 90% war weariness by the time they were at 50%. The status quo peace is like a compromise if u own a claimed system when a status quo happens you get said system and vice versa , u don’t usually need to bomb planets you just need to make a bigger army to take them, the status quo can be forced on you 2 years after you hit 100% war exhaustion and vice versa, in order to achieve your wargoal u need to. 3. 12. With this, the I would gain 100% exhaustion first and the AI, after 2 years will be able to enforce demands without making any progress. You get a -100 warscore penalty for demanding a surrender and a -100 penalty for demanding vassalization. CryptoThe first person to hit 100% war exhaustion can only surrender when the other party lets them do it. Meanwhile, the winner will usually get to 100% war exhaustion more slowly so he gets the ability to force peace at an opportunate moment first. This can be a voluntary surrender, or the attacker can force a surrender if the defender has no hope of victory. As I am in a federation, I was eventually asked to vote for or against a war with a neighboor we had previously fought with. Your perfect start is ruined, you got the Irassians yet again. #2. For many casus belli it's pointless to pursue surrender because status quo already gives you everything you want. War Exhaustion is just a clock. Not really. #4. If I reach high war exhaustion with a federation for example, but I only destroyed maybe 2 out of 5 members and the rest are untouched, they can force my surrender. Originally posted by Agent Orange: When an empire or alliance in a war reaches 100% war exhaustion, it can be forced into a status quo peace if you want to. Reply Attrition/war exhaustion is a fuzzy timer on wars. I've occupied more than half of an enemy's systems including his capital - the only planet he had. But in theory if not one of the empires sue for peace it could go on. The modifiers above are for when the AI 'voluntarily' accepts a. No one, neither player nor AI is forced to surrender because of. The reason you need to occupy all the planets in systems you claimed to Enforce War Goals is that the game enforces a penalty for unoccupied systems and planets, which looks something like: planet (-10), system (-100). And even if you hit 100% you get a little grace period before you end up in a forced status quo. The first method is one side in the conflict surrenders. The problem is that the gains are too high from certain things and it doesn't really care. I would rather say the opposite. they are fully occupied. The war exhaustion system in stellaris is quite different. If one side has 100%, a countdown starts and at the end of it the other side can force peace. An amazing starting area with great habitable planets, a perfect choke point, no nearby powerhouses to threaten you. Demand all the war goals, or surrender giving over all the war goals, then type "play 00" into the console to return to. He attacks me twice, I lose some ships but win the battles. An amazing starting area with great habitable planets, a perfect choke point, no nearby powerhouses to threaten you. 24 months after you hit 100% exhaustion, you can be forced into Status Quo. For occupation it is more important to occupy their planets, than the systems/starbases. War fatigue is specifically designed to make it hard for you to destroy big empires in 1 war, so it is doing its job. This means that territories etc will all be reversed back to their pre-war status. If the other side surrenders, all of their systems will be ceded. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. . But even with this setup, the AI does not surrender at 100%. To quote from the wiki: All wars except those of independence have a negative surrender acceptance, which are countered by factors such as Relative Navy Strength (up to +50), war exhaustion (up to +100) and Occupation. . Reply. I set it to fastest and am just waiting for them it to tick to 100% but GOD it's ticking slow. You can only be forced to accept a white peace, which would have resulted in gains for you. I was forced to surrender a humiliation war with two systems untouched, so i assumed the player was playing under the same rules as the AI on this. Always occupy then status quo by driving enemy war exhaustion to 100. After that, I jump to their capital planets to cut off their production. Enforce a status quo. And war. As for getting the surrender. So you can see how you get situations like the OP where the AI fights this massive, decimating battle and seems to get no war exhaustion from it. Resulting in the common situation that even tho your fleet can destroy the enemy easily, you are forced to surrender and give up the territories you coundt reach in time. So what ends up happening, is that once you take the war exhaustion to it's limit (+100), it cancels out the system penalty. To get them to surrender is much more difficult, and in vassalization, it's when you control every planet/habitat by invading them. The enemy's willingness to accept a full surrender is increased by their War Exhaustion and their Occupation scores, increased by having a stronger fleet, decreased by demanding more serious wargoals, and decreased by not fulfilling all of your claims. 100% War Exhaustion just means that who ever reaches this state, has to accept a status quo peace. War exhaustion in Stellaris is just a mechanic to prevent foreverwars between the AI and the player exploiting the AI through war too. . "Furthermore, I think Carthage should be destroyed. Its purpose is to shut down wars early so early wars won't trade too much away while late wars are quick affairs. Which I found strange that they didn't do the same thing for Stellaris because it only makes sense. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. no, there is no forced surrender. Speaking of using RP to explain certain game mechanics, I think it makes sense that losing troops on planetary defense wouldn't contribute to war exhaustion. However, I am the on gaining more war exhaustion despite not engaging at all. You can surrender to them, you can't surrender to the planes flying over because they can't then immediately try to secure the area. No-one else is at war with any of the federation members including the Ovarians. In the case of total war, everything, in a claims war then all claims, etc. Passively over time while at war. r/Stellaris. The only no forced status quo situation would be two genocidal empires fighting, which would make sense, once war is declared it's a battle to. the awakened empire can force status quo because of your war exhaustion, but if it’s winning, it won.